Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 28.06.2025 05:13
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Healthy Returns: Ozempic, Wegovy linked to rare cases of serious eye condition - CNBC
Russia can stop this any time.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
What’s next?
Why is Laura Loomer considered a controversial figure within the conservative media ecosystem?
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Thank you.
Why cant I stop thinking about counsellor between sessions?
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Searching for axions by analyzing X-ray observations of entire galaxies - Phys.org
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Let’s just make it real clear:
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
What’s the funniest thing you’ve heard a child cry about?
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Two Ocean Bands Are Warming Faster Than Ever — What This Means for Our Climate - The Daily Galaxy
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.